The Movies Never Really Died – A Conversation with Mike Scalere About the Past, Present, and Future of Cinema

You can subscribe to the Billy Dees Podcast with no paywalls on your favorite podcast platform.

Mike Scalere

There’s something timeless about talking with people who genuinely love movies. Not just the latest blockbuster, but the history, technology, storytelling, and artistry that have shaped film for more than a century. That’s exactly what happened when I sat down with filmmaker and film historian Mike Scalere.

Mike studied cinema at NYU, spent two decades working in television with HBO and The History Channel, and now produces thoughtful film content through his Scolarious platform. What followed wasn’t simply a discussion about favorite movies—it became a journey through the evolution of cinema itself and why great storytelling continues to matter in an era dominated by streaming, social media, and artificial intelligence.

The Magic Behind the Movies

Like many filmmakers, Mike’s fascination with movies began as a child. An Industrial Light & Magic book showing how Star Wars and Indiana Jones created their visual effects sparked a lifelong curiosity.

Instead of ruining the illusion, learning how films were made only deepened his appreciation. That sense of wonder remains central to our conversation: understanding the craft doesn’t diminish the magic—it enhances it.

Hollywood’s Golden Age

Our discussion explored how World War II unintentionally accelerated filmmaking technology. Cameras originally designed for military use eventually found their way into film production, while advances in sound recording and photography transformed Hollywood.

The post-war years created what many consider cinema’s Golden Age. Families flocked to theaters because movies weren’t just entertainment—they were an event. Before television became widespread, theaters offered newsreels, comedy shorts, cartoons, and feature films all in one experience.

Mike pointed out an interesting historical irony: early Hollywood executives were actually skeptical of color films because audiences associated color with cartoons. Black-and-white represented “reality,” while color seemed too fantastical—until films like The Wizard of Oz forever changed public perception.

Television Changed Everything

The arrival of television in the 1950s forced Hollywood to rethink its approach.

Instead of trying to imitate television, movie studios doubled down on spectacle. Wider screens, CinemaScope, VistaVision, Technicolor, stereophonic sound, and epic productions gave audiences something they simply couldn’t experience at home.

As we discussed, cinema didn’t lose to television—it evolved because of it.

Television excelled at live broadcasts. Whether it was The Ed Sullivan Show, the moon landing, or breaking news, TV owned immediacy. Movies responded by becoming larger, grander, and more immersive.

The Rise of More Mature Storytelling

The 1960s brought another transformation.

With the gradual end of the Hays Code, filmmakers began tackling more complex adult themes. Rather than relying solely on clear-cut heroes and villains, audiences embraced morally complicated characters and realistic storytelling.

Films such as Midnight Cowboy and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly reflected a changing culture, while television remained constrained by broadcast standards.

We also discussed how events like the assassination of President Kennedy fundamentally changed television news, planting the seeds for today’s 24-hour news cycle while cinema continued pushing artistic boundaries.

The Incredible Run of the 1970s

For many film lovers—including both of us—the 1970s may represent one of cinema’s greatest decades.

The Godfather, Jaws, Star Wars, and countless other classics fundamentally changed filmmaking.

Mike offered fascinating insight into why Jaws worked so well. The famous mechanical shark frequently malfunctioned, forcing Steven Spielberg to hide it rather than show it. Ironically, what began as a production problem became one of the film’s greatest strengths. Sometimes what audiences don’t see is more terrifying than what they do.

Our conversation also touched on Spielberg’s remarkable visual storytelling, John Williams’ unforgettable music, and how practical filmmaking techniques continue influencing directors today.

VHS, Home Theater, and the Digital Revolution

Few topics generate more nostalgia than the VHS versus Beta debate.

We explored why VHS ultimately won despite Beta’s technical superiority. Licensing strategies, affordability, convenience, and market saturation all played significant roles.

That naturally led into discussions about LaserDisc, DVD, Blu-ray, surround sound, and the rise of home theater during the 1990s.

While technology dramatically improved the home viewing experience, great films like Forrest Gump, Pulp Fiction, Saving Private Ryan, Titanic, and The Shawshank Redemption proved audiences still craved unforgettable stories.

Streaming Didn’t Kill Movies

Many predicted streaming would permanently replace theaters, especially during the COVID pandemic.

Mike doesn’t believe that happened.

Instead, he argues that audiences still want communal experiences.

Movies like Top Gun: Maverick, Barbie, Oppenheimer, and other major theatrical events reminded everyone why seeing a film on the big screen remains special.

Streaming offers convenience.

Theaters offer shared experiences.

Those two things aren’t necessarily in competition.

Practical Effects Still Matter

One of our favorite topics was the continued appeal of practical filmmaking.

Whether discussing Ben-Hur’s legendary chariot race, Christopher Nolan shooting The Odyssey on large-format film, or Tom Cruise performing his own stunts, we agreed there’s something audiences instinctively recognize when what they’re watching is real.

Computer-generated imagery certainly has its place, but practical filmmaking creates a sense of authenticity that’s difficult to replicate.

Artificial Intelligence and the Human Element

Perhaps the most thought-provoking part of our conversation centered on AI.

Mike expressed concern that artificial intelligence risks removing the human element from filmmaking.

Behind every great movie are countless people making creative decisions—writers, directors, actors, editors, cinematographers, composers, lighting crews, and production teams.

Those human choices give films personality.

While AI may become another useful production tool, replacing creativity altogether would sacrifice much of what makes cinema meaningful in the first place.

The Next Generation of Filmmakers

One encouraging trend Mike highlighted is the emergence of filmmakers who built audiences on YouTube and social media before transitioning into feature films.

Rather than simply uploading longer online videos, many are embracing traditional storytelling while bringing fresh ideas and entirely new audiences into theaters.

Every generation shapes cinema differently.

Today’s creators may very well define tomorrow’s classics.

Why Movies Continue to Matter

At its heart, this conversation wasn’t really about cameras, formats, or special effects.

It was about storytelling.

Technology will continue changing. Distribution models will evolve. New platforms will emerge.

But compelling stories—told by passionate creators—continue connecting people across generations.

As Mike says, “Film is about community.”

Whether you’re discussing Ben-Hur, Star Wars, Jaws, The Godfather, or the latest theatrical release, movies become meaningful because they give us something to talk about long after the credits roll.

That’s why cinema has survived every challenge thrown at it over the past century—and why it will likely continue evolving for many years to come.

Find Mike Scalere on YouTube @Scalerious and TikTok

Are Wireless Microphones Really Worth It for Content Creators Just for the Sake of Being Wireless?

If you’ve spent any time looking at microphones lately, you’ve probably noticed that wireless models are everywhere. One microphone that’s been getting a lot of attention is the Maono PD200W, and after spending some time with it, I can honestly say it’s a solid microphone for the money. (About $119.00) It delivers surprisingly good sound quality, and its wireless connection performs well at short distances. If you’re looking for an affordable option for creating content on your phone or other mobile devices, it’s certainly worth considering.

That said, I always try to evaluate new technology with one simple question: Does it actually improve the final product? If the answer is no, I’m usually hesitant to recommend it.

Wireless technology is a perfect example.

The biggest advantage of going wireless isn’t better sound—it’s convenience. There are absolutely situations where wireless microphones are the right choice. If I’m covering a news event in the field, I’m going to use a wireless lavalier microphone. If I’m running sound for a live event and the lead singer wants to move freely around the stage, a wireless microphone is almost essential.

But those situations are the exception, not the rule.

For most studio recordings, podcasts, livestreams, or YouTube videos, a microphone is sitting on a boom arm or desktop stand. Once it’s in place, it doesn’t move. In that case, I have to ask: why add another layer of technology that doesn’t improve the audio?

Throughout my career in broadcasting and live sound, I’ve learned to appreciate simple, dependable equipment. Take the legendary Shure SM57, for example. It’s been trusted everywhere from presidential podiums to rock concerts for decades. It’s versatile, durable, sounds great, and with a wired connection, it’s incredibly reliable.

The more technology you introduce, the more potential points of failure you create.

With a wireless microphone, you now have to think about the transmitter, the receiver, battery life, charging, and possible wireless interference. During a live performance, troubleshooting those issues can become stressful in a hurry. That’s one reason professional wireless systems often cost close to $1,000—they’re engineered to minimize those risks.

Even then, experienced sound engineers often keep a wired microphone ready as a backup.

For content creators, the conversation is a little different. The Maono PD200W isn’t trying to compete with high-end broadcast microphones. It’s designed for people creating videos on their phones, recording social media content, or working away from a traditional desk setup. In that role, it does a very good job.

What I don’t buy into is the idea that wireless somehow makes a microphone more desirable simply because it is wireless.

Many demonstrations compare a wireless microphone held close to someone’s mouth against a phone’s built-in microphone several feet away. Of course the dedicated microphone sounds better. That’s largely because of microphone placement and something called the proximity effect—the closer a quality microphone is to your mouth, the richer and fuller your voice will sound. You don’t need wireless technology to achieve that.

In fact, one of my biggest pet peeves is seeing podcast guests trying to do interviews using only the microphone built into their laptop. Even an inexpensive external microphone—wired or wireless—is going to make a dramatic difference.

At the end of the day, I think the Maono PD200W is a good microphone. It sounds better than I expected, the wireless performance is stable, and it’s an affordable option for mobile content creators. If that’s how you plan to use it, I think you’ll be pleased.

But if you’re recording at a desk, behind a microphone that’s already mounted on a stand, I’d encourage you to ask the same question I always do: What am I really gaining by going wireless?

Sometimes convenience is worth it. Sometimes it isn’t.

For me, reliable audio will always come first.

Hollywood Insider – 20 Years of Tales with Marsha Scarbrough

Marsha Scarbrough

In this episode of The Billy Dees Podcast, Billy sits down with Marsha Scarbrough, a former assistant director with nearly two decades of experience in Hollywood. Speaking from Granada, Spain, Marsha brings listeners into a world that few ever see—the demanding, fast-paced, and often unpredictable life behind the camera. From her early days navigating the Directors Guild training program to working on major film and television productions, her stories offer both humor and hard-earned insight into what it really takes to make movies.

Marsha paints a vivid picture of the assistant director’s role, describing it as the engine that keeps production running. Responsible for everything from scheduling and logistics to managing communication between departments, assistant directors are often the first to arrive and the last to leave. The job is as mentally demanding as it is physical, with long days, little sleep, and constant problem-solving. Yet despite the grueling pace, Marsha shares her appreciation for the creative puzzle of filmmaking—taking a script apart and rebuilding it in the most efficient way possible for production.

Link to Marsha’s Substack

The conversation also dives into her experiences working alongside some of Hollywood’s biggest names. Marsha offers a balanced perspective on celebrity culture, noting that while some actors are generous and collaborative, others can be difficult and ego-driven. Her stories provide a fascinating contrast—particularly when comparing her positive experience working with Clint Eastwood on Bird to more challenging encounters on other sets. These moments highlight not only the personalities involved but also the importance of leadership, professionalism, and emotional intelligence in filmmaking.

Beyond personal anecdotes, the episode explores broader changes in the entertainment industry. From the decline of traditional Hollywood production to the rise of global filming locations like Spain, Marsha and Billy discuss how economics, technology, and shifting audience habits are reshaping the business. They also touch on the impact of streaming, social media, and artificial intelligence—raising important questions about the future of storytelling and the movie-going experience. Ultimately, this episode is both a behind-the-scenes look at Hollywood and a reflection on creativity, resilience, and change. Marsha Scarbrough’s journey—from long days on set to sharing her stories through her memoir 20 Years in Hollywood: Tales to Tell—offers listeners a rare and honest glimpse into an industry that continues to evolve. Whether you’re a film enthusiast or simply curious about what happens beyond the spotlight, this conversation delivers insight, entertainment, and plenty of unforgettable stories

J Herman Kleiger Author – “Tears Are Only Water”

On this episode, I speak with Jim Kleiger, an author and mental health professional with extensive experience in psychology and psychoanalysis.

We discuss Jim’s new book, “Tears Are Only Water,” and how his professional interests influenced his creative writing. Jim shares his background growing up in Denver and his journey into psychology. We also talk about the stigma surrounding mental health, noting that it has improved but still persists.

Jim delves into his foray into creative writing, which began in 2019 and gained momentum during the pandemic. Jim’s novels explore themes of trauma, madness, psychological intrigue, healing, and transformation. “Tears Are Only Water” is described as a psychologically textured suspense and mystery with a hopeful ending.

J. Herman Kleiger

Jim shares a fair amount of light on his background, writing process, and the themes he explores in his books.

J Herman Kleiger, the author’s name otherwise going by Jim, discusses the plot of the book “Tears Are Only Water,” during the episode. The story revolves around characters coping with trauma and a crime investigation. Jim distinguishes his book as a psychological mystery and suspense rather than a typical thriller.

Jim mentions where readers can find his book and his upcoming audiobook release, which will feature multiple narrators and different character perspectives.

You can find the episode on your favorite podcast platform.

-Billy Dees